Generative Structures Inspired by Country
Harlin Bunya Grove
Brisbane Valley Highway, Harlin, QLD | 2022 | 1.4 ha
Harlin Bunya Grove proposes a large-scale agroforestry and horticultural infrastructure along Ivory Creek — a flood-shaped landscape threaded by the Brisbane Valley Rail Trail. Through generative architectural interventions, including a research centre, lecture hall, lookout tower, and bridge, the project fuses timber cultivation, ecological restoration, and civic gathering.
Concept
Drawing from the historic Bunya nut pilgrimage that once moved through this landscape, the design abstracts the cone’s morphology into a modular structural system capable of transforming across diverse topologies.
Rather than relying on algorithmic automation, the system unfolds through hands-on, iterative rule-based exploration. Geometric principles derived from the cone are translated into adaptable architectural forms responsive to site conditions, climate, and programmatic demands.
Morphological development
Modular Seed
The cone’s phyllotaxis and seed curvature inform a singular structural module, establishing a repeatable seed element as the system’s formal foundation.
Host Surface
The system is realised through controlled geometric transformations derived from the Bunya cone, establishing the host surface for modular aggregation.
Tower
The oval volumetric form of the cone becomes a host surface for the tower.
Bridge
The geometry of the Bunya cone is sectioned into a half-cylinder, reoriented to site conditions, and extended longitudinally to accommodate spatial requirements, generating the bridge canopy.
Research Centre
A half-cone volume is extracted, reoriented and resized to respond to site and program.
Public Lecture and Community Hall
A quarter-cone volume is extracted, reoriented to site conditions and scaled into a more civic proportion for gathering space.
Rule- Based Generative System
The project operates through four rules to generate four architectural typologies: a bridge, tower, research centre, and community hall.
Rule 1 — Seed
Constant modular unit derived from Bunya morphology.
Rule 2 — Host Surface
Surface derived from Bunya volumetric and sectional logic, responsive to site and program.
Rule 3 — Surface Aggregation
The seed is distributed across the host surface through controlled variations in scale, density, and orientation, informed by structural logic.
Rule 4 — Contextual Adaptation
Structural ribs and infill are adjusted to enable terrain negotiation and environmental performance.
DNA Strip
Seed → Host Surface → Surface Aggregation → Contextual adaptation
Stage 01- The Bridge
Stage 02 — The Tower
Stage 03 — The Research Centre
Stage 04 — The Public Lecture and Community Hall
System Resolution
The modular seed is constructed from a single curved glulam member connected by steel plate and bolts, enabling structural aggregation. The resulting voids accommodate interchangeable roof membranes such as ETFE, bird netting, or fibreglass.
For the bridge canopy, moulded recyclable, hail-resistant polycarbonate panels are detailed with snap-locking seams and integrated drainage channels. The system provides filtered daylight, rain protection, durability, and replaceable panels, while allowing selective opening to support ventilation and flood permeability.
Flat Prototype for Assembly Testing
A prototype was fabricated in planar laminated plywood sections to test joint tolerances, connection logic, and assembly sequencing.
The Bunya Bridge
The bridge uses a three-hinged arch configuration to span the creek without intrusive piling. It frames key views and provides a sheltered passage for cyclists, pedestrians, farm animals, and emergency vehicles. Designed to accommodate floodwaters, it transfers loads through the arch network to robust concrete abutments.
The bridge reconnects communities and landscapes across the creek, standing as a living tribute to the heritage-listed fallen Walter Taylor Bridge, whose memory continues to shape the town’s identity.
The ‘BIG’ Bunya Cone Tower
Inspired by Australia’s tradition of oversized roadside landmarks, the tower transforms the geometry of the bunya cone into a monumental public lookout. The spatial organisation draws from the cross-section of a female bunya cone—where a central core anchors seed pods that spiral outward—reinterpreted here as ramps and viewing platforms rising through the tower.
Positioned at the highest point of the site, the structure also harvests rainwater for landscape irrigation and emergency fire response.
Interior Experience
A spiralling circulation route rises through the timber lattice, connecting a sequence of viewing platforms within the tower. A 30-metre slide offers visitors a playful descent back to the ground.
Structural Framework
Sixteen glulam columns form the structural core supporting the spiral ramp and modular enclosure. Together they create a lightweight lattice that filters daylight while framing views across the surrounding landscape.
The Research Centre
The research centre combines laboratories, offices, maintenance areas, water storage, and a canopy-height nursery for seedlings, saplings, and five-year test trees, alongside large open growing plots. The modular canopy structure uses interchangeable roof membranes to regulate light, ventilation, and environmental exposure. This system creates an adaptable research environment capable of supporting evolving ecological studies and changing climatic conditions
The Site
The Brisbane Valley Rail Trail is re-routed to weave through a sequence of structures and landscapes—passing the tower, the public lecture and community hall, the research centre, and the bridge—transforming the trail into a curated journey. As it threads across terraces, creek edges, and areas of restored vegetation, the trail becomes a generative spine for renewal, deepening the relationship between architecture, Country, and the evolving landscape.
Reflection
Harlin Bunya Grove reshaped how I understand generative design. It became less about computational form-making and more about listening — allowing Country, growth, and pilgrimage to guide the architecture.
Rather than imposing a design, I learned to respond to the site’s landscape, ecology, and stories. The re-routed rail trail, bridge, tower, and research centre emerged through this dialogue, shaped by movement, heritage, and the natural logic of the place.
Collaborating with engineering students grounded the work further. Through prototyping and structural testing, I saw how ideas translate into material reality. The process strengthened my appreciation of clarity, structure, and shared responsibility.
This project affirmed for me that designing with Country is about creating systems that evolve — places that support renewal and remain open to change. It is a continuous relationship rather than a fixed outcome.
If given the opportunity to continue developing the project, I would explore algorithmic generation of the timber structure, and further test its environmental performance.










